Consider the appropriateness of the title of Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House.
Or,
Analyse the character of the ‘doll’ in Ibsen’s play A Doll’s House. Does the ‘doll’ remain passive in the end of the play?
Or,
Is Nora the 'doll' in Ibsen's play? Support your answer with close reference to the text.
Or,
Do you think that Nora matures as the play proceeds in Ibsen’s A Doll’s House? Justify your answer.
Or,
Would
you regard A Doll’s House as a feminist play? Give reasons for your answer.
Or,
Analyse the social conflicts that emerge from your reading of Ibsen's A Doll's House.
"A Doll's House" is among Henrik Ibsen's
sociological plays, bearing a fine portrait of a male-dominated society.
The play deals with the 'gender relation' of the society and chiefly aimed at
women's emancipation from their husband's proprietary right upon them. Out of this unevenness of male-female
relationship, a conflict which prevailed largely in the contemporary social
setting is conspicuous in the play. To bring out this theme of conflict resulting out of gender
relation in the play, the writer introduces Nora Helmer - in whose
character the title remained exemplified. Literally 'doll' represents a passive and subservient
woman, so "A doll's house" signifies a house dwelled by such a
woman. Keeping in context with this literal meaning, in the play the word
'doll' has been applied to Nora and as such her house is "A doll's
house". The writer depicted the character of Nora glorifying 'wifely
devotion' through it. She was a passive and obedient wife to her husband,
Torvald Helmer. From the very beginning of the play, we find Helmer showing his
authority upon her, whereas Nora, showing no individuality of her own, remained
his 'doll wife' - always conforming to his ideas, opinions and taste. Apart
from her herioc decision of borrowing money from Krogsted without her husband's
concern, she lived in a most passive manner.
…To Get Complete Note Click Here
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.