How does Samuel Johnson defend
Shakespeare on the charge of violating the ‘three unities’?
The neo-classical
critics raised the question of unites concerning the free dramatic expression
of the Elizabethans, particularly Shakespeare. Since the critics of the age
showed allegiance to the rules of the classical writers and critics like
Sophocles, Euripides, Aristotle and Horace, they put their late writers in the
classical mould of (of standard) writing. Whoever fitted nice, passed for valid
and if otherwise invalid. Shakespeare with all his natural capabilities was
brought to the scale of judgment. Here Johnson in his “Preface to Shakespeare”
comes to defend him and shows the inanity of observing the unites of place and
time but action.
Among the unites,
Johnson found only the unity of action justified by reason since it is needed
to present the plot as an inseparable whole. But he founds the grounds for the
unites of time and place to be wholly misleading.
He first echoes the
objection raiser, “The necessity of observing the unites of time and place
arises from the supposed necessity of making the drama credible. The unities
hold it impossible, that an action of months and years can be possibly believed
to pass in three hours. Fiction loses its force when it departs from the
resemblance of reality. From the narrow limitation of time necessarily arises
the contraction of place. The spectator who knows that he saw the first act at
Alexandra, cannot suppose that he sees the next at Rome, at a distance to which
not the dragons of Medea could, in so short a time, have transported him. He
knows with certainty that he has not changed his place, and he knows that place
cannot change itself.”..............................................
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.