Compare the responses of two
contemporaries, Samuel Pepys and John Evelyn, to the same phenomenon: The Great
Fire of London.
The
people of London who had managed to survive the Great Plague in
1665 must have thought that the year 1666 could only be better, and couldn’t
possibly be worse! Poor souls… they could not have imagined the new disaster that
was to befall them in 1666. A fire started on September 2nd in the King’s
bakery in Pudding Lane near London Bridge. Fires were quite a common occurrence
in those days and were soon quelled. Indeed, when the Lord Mayor of London, Sir
Thomas Bloodworth was woken up to be told about the fire, he replied “Pish! A
woman might piss it out!”. However that summer had been very hot and there had
been no rain for weeks, so consequently the wooden houses and buildings were
tinder dry. The fire soon took hold: 300 houses quickly collapsed and the
strong east wind spread the flames further, jumping from house to house. The
fire swept through the warren of streets lined with houses, the upper stories
of which almost touched across the narrow winding lanes. Efforts to bring the
fire under control by using buckets quickly failed. Panic began to spread
through the city. As the fire raged on, people tried to leave the city and
poured down to the River Thames in an attempt to escape by boat. Absolute chaos reigned, as often happens today, as
thousands of ‘sightseers’ from the villages came to view the disaster. Samuel
Pepys and John Evelyn, the diarists, both gave dramatic, first-hand accounts of
the next few days.
Samuel Pepys’ Account of the Great
Fire of London
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.